Jul
12
2010
0

The Smart Way To Buy A Mountain Bike

The Smart Way to buy a Mountain bike, or any other product would be to put in an effort and research the particular item. It’s unfortunate that many people just don’t take the time to do this. The real unfortunate part is that they end up being completely dissatisfied with their purchases because they had higher expectations. So, before you go out on your shopping spree, do your research.

For example, buying mountain bike is not a difficult process. What’s important is that you understand the basics. Start researching as thoroughly as you can. If there are some things that are still leaving you confused, try to sort them out. You can get advice from experienced sales consultants at sporting goods stores, for instance. On the other hand, you can use the Internet to get reviews and more information.

Certainly, you will come across some names, such as Diamondback Bikes. They are a very popular brand for many reasons. They offer good quality at lower prices. So, this is a good option for those who are beginners, and for those who like mountain biking as a hobby.

A Schwinn mountain bike would probably be recommended for the more experienced. Again, you’ll come across numerous models with spectacular features. And, you will also notice that most manufacturers have both aluminum or steel framed bikes. The one you choose is depending on what your intentions are for your bike.

Aluminum frame bikes are obviously lighter than steel framed ones. Of course, they each have their purpose. For instance, if you are racing, then the aluminum one would be best. Whatever the case, make sure that the product you decide on has the best maneuverability possible. You’ll need that control when you are out on those rugged terrains. You must also consider the type of suspension, as this plays a huge role in the smoothness of the ride.

Determining the use of the particular bike is of essence in order to get what you really want. If you are mountain bike racing, then there are particular bike that would be best suited for this purpose. Therefore, it’s determining the ultimate purpose that really counts to ensure your satisfaction.

Another obvious pre-determining factor in choosing the best model for yourself would be your budget. So, it’s important to set a price range to allow you to purchase the best that you can afford.

 Mail this post

Popularity: 2% [?]

Technorati Tags: advice on mountain bikes, Aluminum Frame, Diamondback Bikes, Essence, Experienced Sales Consultants, Maneuverability, Models, mountain bike information, Mountain Bike Racing, Mountain Biking, Plays, Schwinn Bike, Shopping Spree, Smart Buy, Smoothness, Spectacular Features, Sporting Goods Stores, Terrains, Tips for mountain bikes

Mar
11
2010
0

Modeling a New Year’s Resolution

Part of the problem with becoming a cost estimation aficionado, who thrives on parametric modeling, is that one tends to think they can build a model for just about everything: Software, Hardware, Aircraft wings, IT infrastructures, cattle futures, etc. In fact, the more one builds the estimates and discovers that the answers are accurate - the more insatiable the desire becomes. Certainly, it must be possible to build a parametric model for nearly anything!

With that in mind – and considering the time of year – what a perfect opportunity to finally perfect that nastiest of all New Years Eve resolutions, (and the one that rings the bells of cash registers in health clubs, sporting goods stores, and vitamin shops around the world):

“This year I vow to… LOSE WEIGHT!” But, how can one use a parametric modeling approach to losing weight, you ask? Ah, let that beguiling high begin as sacred knowledge bases are considered and the plethora of parameters prescribed. This should be quite easy, after all, look how much a software estimate has in common with losing weight:

* “size” is certainly the largest driving factor in software and ones girth,

* an increase in functionality (due to the lost weight) is the desired outcome for both,

* a methodology must be selected (diet, exercise, grapefruit enemas) to provide an approach,

* and the rigor of oversight (a personal trainer) is key to success or failure

It looks to me as if the math necessary to build a software model contains all the same components for losing weight. Let's give it a try! First I will need to select the appropriate knowledge bases that best reflect what I am trying to model.

The Human Problem

1. I want to lose weight so I can perform better in my personal and professional life.

2. I’d like my body to be slimmer and more attractive.

3. I’m willing to increase my exercise and significantly modify my diet.

4. I prefer to measure my performance in short cycles to ensure I'm making progress.

5. I will need a nutritionist and personal trainer to keep me motivated and encourage my success.

The Software Equivalent

1. Platform: Business Mission Critical – General business and management information system host platform environments that perform functions critical to the execution of the enterprise’s primary mission

2. Application: Graphical User Interface - the impacts of developing user interfaces for business.

3. Acquisition Type: Major Modification – Design will change up to 30% and regression testing will need to be done on all code.

4. Development Method: Agile Full – The primary criterion for determining the content of each repetition is customer need (and is typically customer driven). The focus of this strategy is for the software to evolve as the customer requirements are interpreted and implemented over a period of time.

5. Development Standard: Commercial High – assumes relatively formal processes and reviews to ensure that sufficient documentation is available to maintain and update the software.

Now then, all that’s left is to decide is how much weight I want to lose! The best approach would be to look at this as a problem of "calories may cometh but lots more calories must go-eth!" Since, 3500 is the typical number of calories burned per pound of fat, then for every pound I want to lose I multiply that number by 3500. For example, if I want to lose 35 pounds (hypothetically speaking… truly), then 3500 x 35 pounds = 122,500. This now represents my calorie weight loss goal.

Of course I need to know my current size expressed as calories (rounding down) 200 x 3500 = 700,000

That means my ideal weight in calories would be (700,000 – 122,500) = 577,500 (or 165 pounds). Now there’s a goal!

Using estimation speak – I can say I have 700,000 preexisting calories, plan to delete 122,500 calories so that my effective size will be 577,500 calories. Piece of cake, right?

But, before I go much farther I need to decide what would be a safe and reasonable number of pounds to lose per month. After all, I’m not interested in a starvation diet – (Emmm, Beer!), but I don't want this to take forever. Why not a goal of one year! That way this time next year I can pick a new resolution. So, my goal is (122,500 / 12 months) or 10,208 calories per month.

Finally, using the SEER for Software cost estimation software from Galorath Incorporated, all I have to do is:

1. Create a proxy that reflects my calories per month in effort I’ll need to expend,

2. Select my knowledge bases using the table above,

3. Plug in my ideal weight into the “design for reuse amount”,

4. Enter the amount of weight to be lost as my “preexisting not designed for reuse”

Drum roll please… and ta-da! The answer is I can lose the weight in Ten Months using a peak staff of 4.4 people (Me, trainer, dietician, and fan club I suppose).

Wow -only ten months for me to lose all this hypothetical weight! And that makes since, because as the plan progresses I will be building muscle that burns the calories even faster. Using the SEER for Software cost estimation modeling application I’ve proven that you really can build a parametric model for anything! Now all I need is a ten month sabbatical, funding for the full time dietitian and trainer, and a personal motivator. Any volunteers?

 

 Mail this post

Popularity: 5% [?]

Technorati Tags: Aficionado, Aircraft Wings, Cash Registers, Cattle Futures, cost estimation, Desired Outcome, Diet Exercise, Girth, Health Clubs, Ideal Weight, Knowledge Bases, Losing Weight, New Years Eve, parametric model, Personal Trainer, Professional Life, Rigor, Sacred Knowledge, software cost, Software Model, Sporting Goods Stores, Vitamin Shops, weight loss

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com WordPress Themes